首页> 外文OA文献 >Rule-based and statistics-based processing of language: Insights from neuroscience
【2h】

Rule-based and statistics-based processing of language: Insights from neuroscience

机译:基于规则和基于统计的语言处理:来自神经科学的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To flexibly convey meaning, the human language faculty iteratively combines smaller units such as words into larger structures such as phrases based on grammatical principles. During comprehension, however, it remains unclear how the brain encodes the relationship between words and combines them into phrases. One hypothesis is that internal grammatical principles governing language generation are also used to parse the hierarchical syntactic structure of spoken language. An alternative hypothesis suggests, in contrast, that decoding language during comprehension solely relies on statistical relationships between words or strings of words, that is, the N-gram statistics, and no hierarchical linguistic structures are constructed. Here, we briefly review distinctions between rule-based hierarchical models and statistics-based linear string models for comprehension. Recent neurolinguistic studies show that tracking of probabilistic relationships between words is not sufficient to explain cortical encoding of linguistic constituent structure and support the involvement of rule-based processing during language comprehension.
机译:为了灵活地传达含义,人类语言学院基于语法原则将诸如单词之类的较小单元迭代地组合为诸如短语之类的较大结构。然而,在理解过程中,尚不清楚大脑如何编码单词之间的关系并将其组合为短语。一种假设是,支配语言生成的内部语法原理也用于解析口语的分层句法结构。相反,另一种假设表明,在理解过程中的解码语言仅依赖于单词或单词串之间的统计关系,即N-gram统计,而没有构造分层的语言结构。在这里,我们简要地回顾了基于规则的层次模型和基于统计的线性字符串模型之间的区别以进行理解。最近的神经语言学研究表明,跟踪单词之间的概率关系不足以解释语言组成结构的皮层编码,并不足以支持基于语言的理解过程中基于规则的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号